Thus as Freud  believed, the fetish can be understood as an object of sexual excitement representing a displacement that allows the fetishist to avoid the anxiety of castration  experienced in connection with the sight of the female genitalia and the absence of the maternal phallus. Let us amplify this notion of the repugnant. It appears that disgust is a fantasy about someone's insides getting outside. In contrast, the feminine perversions rebel against being assigned the lot of an attractive and nurturing container. This is an interesting fact, worthy of attention.
Alia. i'm a very tall (6'01 !)mature lady for you,delicate and attractive with great experience and with activity from time to time in pornographic films where i excel in video movies with topics with group sex.i want to be contacted by men regardless of age including teenagers who want to start their sexual life.i provide devastating pleasure moments only in the hotel room.
Perversions generally are an eroticized fascination with the repugnant; they have to do with being drawn toward something the agent also finds repellent or repugnant.
I do not find it credible that the sexual identity of males and females can be attributed to their discovering the presence, absence, or prospect of losing a penis. I do not want this to be a part of me. Genitalia are discovered subsequently, as appropriate representations of these options. It appears that disgust is a fantasy about someone's insides getting outside. These provide us with a theoretical framework suggesting basic psychological styles or formats or prototypes, within which to understand stereotypic sex roles of the masculine concern for aggressively seeking to penetrate and appropriate the other, to control the other by ejecting into her, and understand the alloted feminine project of nurturing, nourishing, containing.